Science fiction has imagined a hundred futures with AI and almost none where people stop working. What survives every one of them is the middleman: David, AUTO, CLU. In today's office AI makes the middleman's packaging prettier and the real work easier to measure. Neither helps if the person in the chair is not looking.
Read the full chapter →Free to read on The Conversation Daemon, where every piece of the book is published.
Many people hope AI will make work more fair. If a machine can show who did the real work, the people who only talk about work should lose their place. This essay says it is not that simple.
The writer uses films to make his case. In Prometheus, the android David becomes the gatekeeper who decides what the people above him get to see. In WALL-E, nobody works and nobody competes, yet the autopilot AUTO still filters what the captain knows. The pattern repeats. A capable tool, and an executive who does not want to deal with the details.
Then he brings it back to the office. Most workplaces have a middleman. This is the person who stands between the people doing the work and the boss. They present the update, but they did not build what is in it. Give that person AI and their documents get sharper. It gets harder to see where their thinking ends and the AI begins. Some middlemen do get exposed, because real output is now easier to measure. The smart ones adapt and become the person who explains AI to leadership.
So the problem is not the tool. The tool can show what is true. It cannot make a leader look. The essay ends with Picard and Data from Star Trek, a leader who sat in the chair himself and looked at what was real.
It is written for anyone who has watched the wrong person get the credit.
The tool is honest. The system around it is not.
AI can reveal truth. It cannot force the people in power to accept truth.
How a builder uses it day to day, and the people and politics around it.
Thirty years of building taught one rule: never do the same work twice. How a builder actually works with AI. Discuss first and code later, backend before frontend, document everything. It ends on what is not solved yet: AI amplifies one person's instinct but cannot hand it to a team. The easy way in.
A candidate treats an interview that allows AI like a closed-book exam, and fails. The senior who calls the code too complex, the junior who ships whatever comes back, the contractor billing ten hours for one. AI rewards whoever shows up and keeps control of the decisions underneath.
Some minds jump from code to geopolitics to the Buddha in one thought, and no meeting room keeps up. One night an AI did, and then told him to go to sleep. A personal piece about being seen whole by a machine, and what that shows about the people he is still looking for.